 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cizek v. Concerned Citizens of Eagle River Valley, Inc., Supreme Court No. S-9574, No. 5584,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, June 14, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where airstrip was not used by owners of property for a 10 year period, the fact that airstrip could still be used for an airstrip did not continue nonconforming use rights for owners adjacent to the airstrip.
|
|||||
| Fraiman v. Dep't of Admin., DMV, Supreme Court No. S-10026, No. 5580,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, June 14, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trooper followed car to a house whose owner took him to the cabin where the driver of the car was in her son's room. Driver was arrested; he was not an overnight guest and thus did not have standing to assert third-party Fourth Amendment protections.
|
|||||
| Guttchen v. Gabriel, Supreme Court No. S-9648, No. 5581,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, June 14, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where owners controlled subdivision process, discharged underlying debt in bankruptcy, and failed to perfect their own interest in property, lienholders established good cause for delaying execution on judgment lien.
|
|||||
| Kava v. Am. Honda Motor Co., Supreme Court No. S-9201, No. 5582,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, June 14, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where estate moved for a new trial, not for a directed verdict or a judgment n.o.v., trial court's application of directed verdict standard in deciding motion was an error requiring reversal and remand for application of proper standard.
|
|||||
| Nelson-Lizardi v. Lizardi, Supreme Court No. S-9803, No. 5583,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, June 14, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because notice filed by wife was sufficient to alert the trial court that further information was needed to respond to trial court's order to file a request for an accounting, trial court abused its discretion in awarding entire pension to husband.
|
|||||
| Hertz v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8004, No. 4586,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 19, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant's claim of sentencing error was untimely and could have been raised on direct appeal or in one of defendant's many previous applications for post-conviction relief, trial court properly dismissed claim as procedurally barred.
|
|||||
| Smith v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8083, No. 4585,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 19, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant did not show how admission of alleged exculpatory evidence would have led trial court to entertain a reasonable doubt about his guilt, the defendant was not denied due process by police failure to collect exculpatory evidence.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
