 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Beecher v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8298, No. 4726,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 18, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State failed to prove that defendant trespassed with the intent to commit a crime, where there was no evidence that he intended to fail to stop at direction of a peace officer at the time his privilege to be on timber company's land terminated.
|
|||||
| Canty v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8382, No. 4720,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 18, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court did not violate defendant's right to confront the witnesses against him in his violation of a domestic violence protective order prosecution, where the bias evidence sought to be put in evidence would not have been admissible.
|
|||||
| Duque v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8316,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 18, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant failed to show the trial court abused its discretion by denying his request to modify his sentence following the revocation of his probation where even though it found that he needed treatment, his prospect for rehabilitation was low.
|
|||||
| Fields v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8335, No. 4719,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 18, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court erred by denying defendant's second application for post-conviction relief where some evidence existed that suggested ineffective assistance of counsel at his murder trial and he was entitled to a court-appointed attorney.
|
|||||
| Hinton-Logan v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8292,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 18, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court did not err by rejecting defendant's entrapment defense as there was no persuasion or inducement by police to compel her to deliver cocaine or in refusing to allow her to withdraw her guilty plea.
|
|||||
| Jackson v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8168, No. 4724,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 18, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's argument, that a reference in a rule of criminal procedure to a "violation" made the rule applicable to probation revocation hearings, was without merit.
|
|||||
| Roberts v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8175, No. 4723,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 18, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's motion for a new trial based on newly discovered following his multiple convictions was properly denied where the evidence failed to meet the requirements for such relief.
|
|||||
| Russell v. State, Court of Appeals Nos. A-7997, A-8117,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 18, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's claims of his attorney's ineffectiveness were not claims appellate court could resolve on trial record. If defendant's attorney required any relief due to illness, he would have requested it. Defendant was found mentally competent.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
