 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Casey v. Semco Energy, Inc., Supreme Court No. S-10830, No. 5813,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, June 11, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employer purchased gas company that had employed managers. Managers, in a settlement agreement, resigned from their positions. Employer did not breach covenant of good faith by not including managers in an early retirement plan.
|
|||||
| Doe v. Dep't of Public Safety, Supreme Court No. S-10338, No. 5815,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, June 11, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant whose conviction was set aside before Alaska Sex Offender Registration Act became specifically applicable to set-aside convictions was wrongly forced to register, as applying the Act to him violated due process under state constitution.
|
|||||
| Excursion Inlet Packing Co. v. Ugale, Supreme Court No. S-10790, No. 5814,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, June 11, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Workers' Compensation Board properly applied presumption of compensability, but erred in finding there was substantial evidence to overcome it, where questions remained about how employee died while waiting for a flight out of employer's remote site.
|
|||||
| Glover v. Glover, Supreme Court No. S-10848, No. 5812,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, June 11, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Action to quiet title was remanded, because determination of whether a claimant repudiated true owner's interest in property through positive assertion of his own claim of ownership or through a long and unambiguous occupation of property was needed.
|
|||||
| Coronell v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8463, No. 4884,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 16, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate's petition for post-conviction relief was properly denied as his decision to accept a plea bargain was not influenced by his dissatisfaction with his trial attorney or by any alleged despair concerning the probable outcome of his first trial.
|
|||||
| Nicholi v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8311, No. 4880,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 16, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court's decision not to hold a separate hearing on defendant's claim that certain evidence the State intended to offer was scientific evidence that did not meet the standards of reliability and relevance did not affect his convictions.
|
|||||
| Nook v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7837, No. 4883,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 16, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a murder case, officers warrantless entry into defendant's home did not violate his constitutional rights where they entered the home to check on the victim, they did not realize that defendant also lived there, and they then obtained a warrant.
|
|||||
| Venning v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8106, No. 4882,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 16, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the trial court applied the wrong burden of proof when assessing whether the newly discovered evidence would produce an acquittal, the case was remanded for reassessment under the correct burden of proof for a witness's statement.
|
|||||
| Wood v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8407, No. 4881,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 16, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence in a coercion case was proper where, in spite of a domestic violence restraining order, defendant went into the house with the intention of confronting the victim and terrorized the victim for hours.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
