 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Giesler v. Cannava, Supreme Court No. S-12351, No. 1279,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, June 20, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a husband's criminal history and a custody investigator's report indicated that the husband had anger management issues, a trial court properly considered the factors of Alaska Stat. § 25.24.150(c) and awarded legal custody of a minor child to the wife. Trial court was not obligated to adopt the investigator's recommendation of joint custody.
|
|||||
| Godsoe v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-9505, No. 5229,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 20, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A motion under Alaska R. Crim. P. 35(a) was denied because a sentence imposed conformed to the oral pronouncement where the judge's remarks, taken as a whole, indicated an intent to impose consecutive sentences under former Alaska Stat. § 12.55.025.
|
|||||
| Haynes v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-9080, No. 5231,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 20, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A remand of the denial of a motion to suppress evidence was necessary because a trial judge's findings did not coincide with the testimony of a state trooper investigator regarding why it was necessary to remove items from defendant's pants pocket during an arrest; the items were discovered during a pat-down search.
|
|||||
| Moore v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-9107, No. 5230,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 20, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Probable cause supported issuance of a search warrant as (1) investigator's affidavit connected the altered gas can in defendant's carport with possible methamphetamine production; (2) he was frequently purchasing ephedrine-based cold medicine and stove fuel; and (3) evidence relating to methamphetamine production might still be found in his home.
|
|||||
| Allen v. Vaughn, Supreme Court No. S-12080, No. 6133,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, June 22, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In divorce matter, husband's and wife's property did not sell; therefore, they entered into a new agreement. Supreme court refused to find that agreement called for forfeiture of property from one party to another because equity abhorred forfeiture. Instead, supreme court determined agreement should be understood as creating an equitable mortgage.
|
|||||
| Dickerson v. Goodman, Supreme Court Nos. S-11497/S-12257, No. 6135,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, June 22, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Following dismissal of driver's suit against another motorist, motorist sought to intervene and to bring suit against the driver; however, denial of motion to intervene was proper. Further, second suit was barred because Alaska R. Civ. P. 13(a) required motorist to bring counterclaim in driver's suit before it was dismissed.
|
|||||
| Roberts v. State, Supreme Court No. S-12180, No. 6134,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, June 22, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Business owner challenged Department of Revenue's approval of nonprofit organization's free bicycle loan program, which was supported by gaming funds. Claims' assignments to corporation's business owner was inappropriate because assignment was attempt to circumvent requirements of Alaska Stat. § 22.20.040(a)(2) regarding representation by attorney.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
