Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - Alaska - July 27 - August 5, 2005

  
Gregorio v. Gregorio, Supreme Court Nos. S-10850/S-11139, No. 1221, SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, July 27, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court's grant of wife's writ of execution was premature as the requisite finding of just and sufficient reasons for wife's delay in obtaining a writ as required by Alaska Stat. ? 09.35.020 was omitted, and pleadings raised material issues of fact as to whether the original judgment had been satisfied and, if not, how much remained due.

Search Cases for Free

  
W.C. v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8843, No. 4997, COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, July 27, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Because the record supported a finding that a juvenile aided and abetted other vandals, the trial court's restitution order holding him liable for all of the damages was affirmed under former Alaska Stat. ? 12.55.045(f) and the trial court was not obligated to assess his ability to pay restitution where he presented no evidence on the issue.

Search Cases for Free

  
Edmonds v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8998, No. 1998, COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, July 29, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant received a composite sentence for four counts of sexual assault pursuant to Alaska Stat. ? 12.55.025 (repealed 2004); he claimed that the sentence violated his right to a jury trial. Sentence was lawful because appellate court concluded that judge's ability to impose consecutive or concurrent sentences was not altered by recent caselaw.

Search Cases for Free

  
Johnson v. Huges Thorsness Powell Huddleston & Bauman LLC (In re Estate of Johnson), Supreme Court No. S-11084, No. 5928, SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, July 29, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: A trial court erred by approving the final accounting and decree of distribution for an estate because a law firm failed to meet the burden of proving that the fees charged were reasonable under Alaska R. Prof. Conduct 1.5; the billing records were too vague to establish whether the charges were reasonable.

Search Cases for Free

  
Lee v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8819, No. 1997, COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, July 29, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Appellate court held that attorney could not have a professional transcriber conduct word-for-word review of the transcript prepared by attorney's office because it was a violation of Alaska R. App. P. 210(b)(3) and Alaska Admin. R. 36(a) for attorney or one of his employee's to prepare a draft transcript for a professional transcriber.

Search Cases for Free

  
Milligrock v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8733, No. 1999, COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, July 29, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: A sentence for third degree assault did not violate the Sixth Amendment, even though aggravating factors under Alaska Stat. ? 12.55.155(c) were not decided by a jury, because two of the factors related to defendant's prior convictions. There was no plain error regarding the third factor since the victim's relationship with defendant was undisputed.

Search Cases for Free

  
Wendell C. II v. State, Supreme Court No. S-11601, Supreme Court No. 11604, No. 5929, SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, July 29, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Termination of parents' parental rights was affirmed; judge's reliance on studies that were not admitted into evidence was harmless error as parents had long-standing problems with alcohol abuse, children had been in foster care since 2002, and no reasonable likelihood existed that the decision would have been different absent the studies.

Search Cases for Free

  
Alyssa B. v. Dep't of Health & Social Servs., Supreme Court No. S-11378, No. 5930, SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, August 5, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: As Alaska Const. art. I, ? 16 preserved the right to a jury trial only for causes of action that were legal, not equitable in nature, and due process clause, Alaska Const. art. I, ? 7, did not require the availability of jury trials in child-in-need-of-aid proceedings, a mother's request for a jury trial was properly denied.

Search Cases for Free

  
Rockney v. Boslough Constr. Co., Supreme Court No. S-11444, SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, August 5, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Swarner v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-9281, No. 2002, COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 5, 2005, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: In a drug case, extradition was sufficiently supported where an affidavit of probable cause was sworn to before a notary public; because the three methods for supporting an extradition request were specified disjunctively in Alaska Stat. ? 12.70.020(a)(2), an affidavit that supported an information did not have to be sworn to before a magistrate.

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top