 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Baker v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7316, No. 4290,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, October 4, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where informant only introduced suspect to undercover officers, exclusion of evidence of informant's later indictment did not have a substantial effect on the jury's verdict or prevent suspect from presenting a defense.
|
|||||
| House v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7537, No. 4291,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, October 4, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant could not have preserved the issue of whether he knowingly failed to file the sex offender report. Thus, he did not receive the benefit of his bargain and he had to have the opportunity to withdraw his plea and go to trial.
|
|||||
| Love v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7230, No. 4286,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, October 4, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In defendant's appeal of assault conviction, there was no error in not suppressing statements as officer's statements were not designed to elicit incriminating evidence; trial court did not err in not suppressing identification.
|
|||||
| Nickoli v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7192, No. 4285,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, October 4, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Rape shield statute could not have been used to prevent defendant from proving his on-going sexual relationship with victim, but defendant failed to establish that pre-accusation delay prejudiced his defense.
|
|||||
| Riddle v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7339, No. 4289,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, October 4, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's finding that appellant had merely a change of heart when he sought to withdraw his no contest plea to several assault charges was not clearly erroneous. Appellant did not show a fair and just reason for withdrawing his plea.
|
|||||
| Stewart v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7605, No. 4288,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, October 4, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sentencing judge's factual findings were supported by the record, and these factual findings established a good reason for imposing on appellant a composite sentence of 10 years with 4 years suspended.
|
|||||
| Thompson v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7249, No. 4287,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, October 4, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Fact that correctional officer took suspect into private office and asked if she had brought anything into facility consistent with questioning visitor to jail might have expected to encounter, and was not custodial interrogation.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
