 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Johnson v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7264, No. 4258,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 9, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court affirmed the denial of defendant's motion to suppress in prosecution for possession of cocaine; police arrested defendant on valid warrant, and the officer felt an object that could have been a knife in defendant's pocket.
|
|||||
| Latham v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7198, No. 4259,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 9, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's attempt to re-litigate an issue on appeal was denied because the law of the case doctrine prohibited the reconsideration of issues that had been adjudicated in a previous appeal in the same case.
|
|||||
| Price v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7217, No. 4256,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 9, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Convictions were upheld because the State's failure to preserve the fingerprint evidence did not violate appellant's right to due process; and the trial court was not clearly mistaken when it sentenced appellant.
|
|||||
| Solotov v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7359, No. 4257,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 9, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in denying defendant's motion to vacate default judgment entered for failing to respond to traffic citation, because it appeared defendant did not receive notice of citation until after the default judgment was entered.
|
|||||
| Stough v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7022, No. 4260,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 9, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's convictions were affirmed because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to withdraw the plea, and the sentencing was not an abuse of the trial court's discretion or clearly erroneous.
|
|||||
| Wood v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7592, No. 4261,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 9, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Following probation revocation, judge's imposition of all of appellant's two years of suspended imprisonment was proper when although appellant had some positive accomplishments, they were outweighed by his two assault convictions on probation.
|
|||||
| Kachemak Bay Conservation Soc'y v. Department of Natural Resources, Supreme Court No. S-8554, No. 5303,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, August 11, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Agency approval of oil and gas lease sale program affirmed where review was permissibly limited to the lease sale phase, and agency showed reasonable basis for "best interests" finding and consistency with coastal management plan.
|
|||||
| Kim v. Nat'l Indem. Co., Supreme Court No. S-9207, No. 5305,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, August 11, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where taxi driver's insurance policy covered only accidental injury and barred coverage for injury arising from intentional acts and sexual molestation, policy did not provide coverage for taxi driver's sexual abuse of minor.
|
|||||
| Nichols v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., Supreme Court No. S-8969, No. 5304,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, August 11, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where appellee insurance company owed no duty to appellant, who fell off neighbor's ladder, to locate or preserve ladder, a claim for negligent spoliation could not be separately maintained against appellee.
|
|||||
| Powers v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, Supreme Court No. S-8776, No. 5302,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, August 11, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Collateral estoppel did not bar insurance carrier from arbitration with claimant where carrier lacked privity with another insurance carrier, which had previously engaged in arbitration with the claimant on the same claims.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
