 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Frank v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8941, No. 5094,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, July 26, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was tried for misconduct involving weapons, pursuant to Alaska Stat. § 11.61.200, and third-degree assault, pursuant to Alaska Stat. § 11.41.220(a)(1)(A). Appellate court could not say conviction for third-degree assault was not affected by trial court's error because trial court incorrectly admitted photographs of incident's reenactment.
|
|||||
| Kehlenbach v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-9068, No. 5095,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, July 26, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Layered post-conviction relief application, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel, was properly dismissed because applicant failed to show evidence was insufficient to support murder conviction, and he did not show prejudice. Claim of prejudice because prosecutor was former defense attorney was time-barred by Alaska Stat. § 12.72.020(a)(2).
|
|||||
| Trinidad v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-9142, No. 5096,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, July 26, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was on parole when officers contacted him in bar; his parole conditions prohibited drinking and entering bars. Trial judge properly upheld parole conditions because conditions related to rehabilitation. Trial judge properly denied motion to suppress because officer had probable cause to arrest defendant for possession of illegal drugs.
|
|||||
| Winterrowd v. Municipality of Anchorage, Court of Appeals No. A-09233 & A-09234,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, July 26, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
