 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Anderson v. Tuboscope Vetco, Supreme Court No. S-9080, No. 5319,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, October 6, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Special employer came under reach of Alaska Workers' Compensation Act, and temporary employee's exclusive remedy was workers' compensation. Temp agency was not responsible for attorney fees under unjust enrichment theory.
|
|||||
| Dobos v. Ingersoll, Supreme Court Nos. S-8567/S-8707, No. 5318,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, October 6, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: It was not err to admit hearsay under present sense impression exception. While denial of fees based on party's failure to admit negligence was proper, it was error not to award such fees for refusing to admit medical records.
|
|||||
| Foley v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7514, No. 1692,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, October 6, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's five-year maximum sentence was affirmed because the record supported the findings and the findings supported the decision to sentence appellant to the maximum term for felony driving while intoxicated.
|
|||||
| Griffin v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7419, No. 1693,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, October 6, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's 23-year composite sentence was not an abuse of discretion where the sentence was in the range of reasonable sentences based upon appellant's criminal history and the seriousness of appellant's current offenses.
|
|||||
| Grant v. Stoyer, Supreme Court No. S-9016, No. 5322,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, October 13, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Regarding jury verdict for defendant in personal injury action, new trial was to be granted where uncontroverted evidence showed that defendant's negligence caused injured party to suffer injuries requiring medical treatment.
|
|||||
| Grinols v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7349, No. 1694,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, October 13, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant was entitled to a second post-conviction appeal on the issues of whether his probation was illegally extended, as it was a new issue, and his challenge to effective assistance of counsel.
|
|||||
| Gwich'in Steering Comm. v. Office of the Governor, Supreme Court Nos. S-9026, S-9046, No. 5323,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, October 13, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The documents requested by appellant under the Alaska Public Records Act were privileged, because they were predecisional and deliberative, and the interest in disclosure failed to outweigh the interest in confidentiality.
|
|||||
| Jenkins v. Handel, Supreme Court No. S-9122, No. 5321,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, October 13, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The denial of appellant's motion to modify custody was not an abuse of discretion, the court therefore affirmed.
|
|||||
| Waiste v. State, Supreme Court No. S-8068, No. 5320,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, October 13, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Seizure of fishing boat, although based on erroneous criminal charge, did not violate Takings Clause or double jeopardy; due process required no more than a prompt postseizure hearing, which was provided.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
