 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| O'Callaghan v. Director of Elections, Supreme Court No. S-9768, No. 5310,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, August 16, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because blanket primary election statute was unconstitutional, Alaska elections director had authority to abrogate statute and to promulgate emergency regulations to implement a primary election that was constitutional.
|
|||||
| Van Ornum v. Municipality of Anchorage, Court of Appeals No. A-7215, No. 4263,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 16, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conviction of driving while intoxicated was affirmed because the refusal to give appellant a breath test did not interfere with his due process right to collect exculpatory evidence.
|
|||||
| Ashley v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7167, No. 1683,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 18, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conviction of reckless driving was upheld because the evidence was sufficient to support an inference of recklessness that could have convinced the jury, beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant was guilty.
|
|||||
| Child Support Recovery Servs. ex rel. S.C. v. Inn at the Waterfront, Inc., Supreme Court No. S-8691, No. 5307,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, August 18, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An employer was liable to the state for failure to comply with an order to withhold income of its employee, the non-custodial parent of a minor child.
|
|||||
| R.I. v. C.C., Supreme Court No. S-9389, No. 5308,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, August 18, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Child custody award was upheld because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding sole legal and physical custody to appellee mother; and appellant's other arguments lacked merit or were not before the court.
|
|||||
| State v. Button, Supreme Court No. S-8792/8942, No. 5309,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, August 18, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellee was not liable for child support arrears because he rebutted the presumption of paternity at his first formal opportunity and before a final child support order was issued by appellant.
|
|||||
| State v. Maxwell, Supreme Court No. S-8886, No. 5306,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, August 18, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellee was not accorded due process of law when appellant entered a child support order and established child support arrears against him; therefore, the child support order was void.
|
|||||
| Greer v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7220, No. 4264,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 23, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Grand jury testimony about prior drug activity, even if inadmissible, could not have influenced the grand jury's decision to indict because the other evidence was legally sufficient to support the indictment.
|
|||||
| Schikora v. State, Supreme Court No. S-8972, No. 5311,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, August 25, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Alaskan resident was denied permanent fund dividends where he was absent for more than 180 days per year, and rule did not violate right to travel or Commerce Clause, and was substantially related to legitimate state interests.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
