 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Botelho ex rel. Members of Alaskan Sports Bingo Joint Venture v. Griffin, Supreme Court No. S-9535, No. 5424,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, June 22, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The attorney general had authority to enforce charitable trusts and to assert a charity's cause of action after the charity dismissed or settled a claim against third parties for less than the charity was owed under the state's gaming laws.
|
|||||
| Holderness v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., Supreme Court No. S-8939, No. 5425,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, June 22, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where surgeon was injured in car accident and his suit against his insurers was partially dismissed, umbrella policy qualified as automobile liability insurance, and accident was not covered by his general liability policy.
|
|||||
| Johnson v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7401, No. 1750,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 22, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In defense counsel's motion to withdraw, the attorney's brief was insufficient to show why the issues raised were frivolous because the brief contained only a cursory discussion of the facts and no discussion of the law.
|
|||||
| Smith v. Cleary, Supreme Court Nos. S-7810/7850, No. 5426,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, June 22, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the settlement agreement about conditions in Alaska prisons required court approval, the superior court did not exceed its authority by requiring the Arizona prison facility to comply with the agreement when housing Alaska prisoners.
|
|||||
| State v. Bonham, Court of Appeals No. A-7614, No. 1749,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 22, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Prosecution of the state indictment was not barred by statute, or by the Alaska double jeopardy clause, because the facts recited in the federal plea agreement did not include the acts which were alleged in the state indictment.
|
|||||
| Jones v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7328, No. 4414,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 27, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court was ordered to make additional findings as to whether or not defendant was under arrest for a crime or only in custody and whether or not the defendant actually knew he was in custody.
|
|||||
| Krueger v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7411, No. 4413,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 27, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's disorderly conduct conviction upheld because court properly: (1) denied motion to withdraw his plea; (2) allowed State to submit portion of its restitution request after court-ordered 60 day extension; and (3) ordered restitution.
|
|||||
| Lanni v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7802, No. 4415,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 27, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: While license revocation was to begin with imposition of sentence, extension of revocation beyond the defendant's incarceration was the stated intent of the trial court and was not an illegal increase in the sentence.
|
|||||
| Nunley v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7733, Court of Appeals No. A-7734, Court of Appeals No. A-7735, No. 1751,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 29, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendants were properly convicted for failing to comply with the Alaska Sex Offender Registration Act. Trial court did not err in denying defendants' motions to dismiss their cases.
|
|||||
| Sierra v. Goldbelt, Supreme Court No. S-8961, No. 5427,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, June 29, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Native claims settlement act allowed a native corporation to issue shares to groups of native elders without consideration, and corporation satisfied its disclosure duty in proxy statement soliciting votes for the elder benefit program.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
