 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Allen v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7430, No. 1815,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, July 26, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where prosecutor's comments on subject of punishment was to show that juror's support of compromise verdict to obtain a lesser sentence for defendant was improper, prosecutor's comments did not require reversal of conviction.
|
|||||
| DeNardo v. ABC Inc. RVs Motorhomes, Supreme Court No. S-9980, No. 5599,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, July 26, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an employment matter, the court did not abuse its discretion in imposing the sanction of involuntary dismissal as a sanction for a party's failure to provide discovery of tax returns as ordered by the court.
|
|||||
| Johnson v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8079, No. 1811,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, July 26, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the former convicted criminal had not shown extraordinary circumstances to override public access to court records of his criminal convictions, superior court did not abuse its discretion when it denied his motion to seal his court records.
|
|||||
| Mahan v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7662, No. 1812,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, July 26, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant who was convicted of cruelty to animals and who was ordered to pay restitution to a rescue organization was not entitled to a an offset or a refund for monetary donations received by the organization for the care of the animals.
|
|||||
| McGee v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7697, No. 1814,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, July 26, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: After denial of defendant's motion to suppress evidence from package addressed to him, opened by police after they subjected it to ion mobility spectrometer test, he appealed and case was remanded for determination of reasonable suspicion.
|
|||||
| Ostlund v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7787, No. 1813,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, July 26, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant's two prior DWI convictions unnecessarily presented jurors with information that could have unfairly prejudiced their deliberations, trial court erred in not bifurcating defendant's trial to remove prejudice of prior convictions.
|
|||||
| Shook v. Alyeska Pipeline Serv. Co., Supreme Court No. S-9530, No. 5600,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, July 26, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred, and remand was necessary, when it decertified a class and failed to mention the appropriate rule of civil procedure or any of its requirements, and instead gave merit-related grounds for its order.
|
|||||
| United Airlines, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., Supreme Court No. S-9672, No. 5601,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, July 26, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where accident occurred on property the state leased to lessor who subleased property to airline, the plain language of the indemnity clause in the sublease required the airline to indemnify and defend the lessors against state's third-party claim.
|
|||||
| Bauder v. Alaska Airlines, Inc., Supreme Court No. S-9886, No. 5603,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, August 2, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The Alaska Workers' Compensation Board correctly determined an injured airline employee's entitlement to disability benefits.
|
|||||
| Wold v. Progressive Preferred Ins. Co., Supreme Court No. S-9775, No. 5602,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, August 2, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where deceased's parents settled with known driver and her mother claimed benefits on mother's uninsured/underinsured motorists policy, preclusion of mother from claiming payments for negligence attributable to unknown driver was proper.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
