 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Henry v. State, Court of Appeals Nos. A-9563 & A-9564, No. 5249,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 1, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An order issued pursuant to Alaska Stat. § 12.63.020(a)(1) that directed appellant to register as a sex offender for the rest of his life was affirmed where he had been convicted of two counts of first-degree indecent exposure, Alaska Stat. § 11,41,458(a), which arose from conduct that occurred on different days and involved different victims.
|
|||||
| Holden v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-9153, No. 5250,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 1, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's motion to withdraw his no contest plea to one count of refusal to submit to a chemical test was properly denied where he had not squarely presented his theory to the trial court that his attorney did not advise him of his appellate rights, he was unaware of those rights, and he would not have pled guilty if he had understood them.
|
|||||
| Peters v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-9303, No. 5248,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 1, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court properly denied appellant's postconviction petition where the jury was properly instructed that the ultimate fact to be proven was his blood alcohol level at the time of his driving and thus, neither his trial or appellate counsel acted incompetently when they failed to challenge his DWI conviction on that ground.
|
|||||
| Anderson v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8064, No. 2113,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 3, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In defendant's trial for assault, State introduced statement from victim to officer who first arrived to scene. Defendant's Sixth Amendment right to confrontation was not violated, under the circumstances presented, because statement to officer that defendant hit victim with pipe was non-testimonial.
|
|||||
| DeNardo v. Corneloup, Supreme Court No. S-11703,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, August 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Denkinger v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-9632, No. 5253,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant convicted under Alaska Stat. § 16.05.722, allowing forfeiture of illegally caught fish without providing a jury trial right, was not deprived of equal protection under Alaska Const. art. I, § 1, even though a similar misdemeanor provision provided for jury trial, because unlike that provision, § 16.05.722 did not carry a prison sentence.
|
|||||
| Hodges v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-9507, No. 5252,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's motion to withdraw a guilty plea to negligent homicide was properly denied where the plea had not been rejected as too lenient under Alaska R. Crim. P. 11(e), she failed to establish any manifest injustice, and the record showed that she had merely changed her mind, which was not a fair and just reason under Alaska R. Crim. P 11(h)(2).
|
|||||
| Nelson v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co., Supreme Court No. S-11793,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, August 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
