 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Alaskans for Efficient Gov't v. Alaska, No. S-10633, Order No. 41,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, August 7, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petition summary for relocation initiative to relocate state legislative sessions was not true and impartial because it would have negated the Frank Initiative by disregarding the requirement that the voters be informed of the total costs involved.
|
|||||
| Awana v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8024, No. 4603,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 7, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial judge did not err in denying defendant's motion to suppress, where reasonable person in defendant's position would not have believed from conversation with State troopers that they would be arrested if they failed to consent to search.
|
|||||
| Kendall v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7900, No. 4601,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 7, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress as the officer's testimony regarding the defective signal light on defendant's car was sufficient to establish probable cause to stop defendant's vehicle.
|
|||||
| Ward v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7748, No. 4602,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 7, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in not dismissing the charges after the State refused to give a witness immunity, as there was no compelling evidence that defendant's version, or witness' intended testimony, was true.
|
|||||
| Beatty v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7986, No. 1816,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 9, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in refusing to instruct jury on lesser-included offense of attempted robbery in the first degree because record did not establish that some evidence supported a finding that the lesser-included offense occurred.
|
|||||
| Collins v. Blair, Supreme Court No. S-9810,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, August 9, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Without a clear indication of what assets were "hard assets" and who contributed those assets to closely held corporation, trial court did not abuse its discretion in distributing assets of corporation based on parties' respective stock holdings.
|
|||||
| Hunt v. Univ. of Alaska, Supreme Court No. S-10115, No. 5605,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, August 9, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: College's requirement that student pass Praxis exam as a condition of admission to program was a legitimate choice of an objective measurement of student's skills, and therefore was not an abuse of discretion by the college.
|
|||||
| In re S.H., Supreme Court No. S-9633, No. 5604,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, August 9, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where ward's claims were settled by the conservator prior to his petition for termination of the conservatorship, the superior court did not err in failing to hold a hearing on the ward's petition to terminate.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
