 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Grinols v. State, Supreme Court No. S-9939/9940, No. 5718,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, August 1, 2003 , Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As an indigent defendant had a constitutional and statutory right to effective counsel in a first application for post-conviction relief, he had a right to challenge the effectiveness of counsel in his second petition for post-conviction relief.
|
|||||
| McElroy v. Kennedy, Supreme Court No. S-10380, No. 5719,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, August 1, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Res judicata barred a father from bringing a second action to litigate his claim for child support restitution.
|
|||||
| Sherry R. v. Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., Supreme Court No. S-10831, No. 5721,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, August 1, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Superior court did not err in finding that the mother failed to remedy within a reasonable period of time conduct or conditions that placed her four children at substantial risk of harm, such that termination of her parental rights was proper.
|
|||||
| State v. Dupier, Court of Appeals Nos. A-8270/8271, No. 1892,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 1, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Alaska Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission had no authority to require fishers operating exclusively in federal waters to obtain interim-use permits; fishers could not be penalized by failing to get permits, where commission had not issued them.
|
|||||
| Teseniar v. Teseniar, Supreme Court No. S-10632/10685/10686, No. 5720,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, August 1, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court abused its discretion by increasing a husband's child support obligation without considering his obligation for children from a prior marriage and by retroactively applying the increase to a date before the motion to modify was filed.
|
|||||
| Vukmir v. Vukmir, Supreme Court No. S-10594, No. 5722,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, August 1, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Testator's will demonstrated his intent to provide all of his heirs with a bequest of the full exercise price of one of the heir's option to purchase his residence, rather than a bequest of the exercise price minus the outstanding mortgage debt.
|
|||||
| Turner v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7701, No. 4740,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 6, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial judge did not err in refusing to order a new competency evaluation after defendant suffered a seizure near end of trial where evidence was that defendant could experience mild seizures without having them affect his competency to stand trial.
|
|||||
| James v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8109, No. 1893,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 8, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant had a Fifth Amendment right not to admit guilt during mandated sex offender treatment for offenses of which he had been convicted because such admissions could have been used against him if he obtained post-conviction relief.
|
|||||
| Witt v. State, Supreme Court No. S-10564, No. 5723,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, August 8, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State was entitled to summary judgment on an employee's claims, as there were no genuine disputes whether his employment was at-will, the State breached the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, or engaged in impermissible contracting.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
