 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Emery v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7799, No. 4608,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 14, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because expert on child abuse assisted jury in understanding evidence by explaining potential reasons why child did not report abuse for two years after last event, and because expert had sufficient training, she was properly qualified to testify.
|
|||||
| Holloway v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7815, No. 4605,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 14, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant's conduct approximated the more serious offense of murder rather than manslaughter, trial court did not err in finding "most serious" aggravating factor and sentencing defendant according to that finding.
|
|||||
| Luck v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7593, No. 4607,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 14, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for assault on two police officers was affirmed where he was adequately informed of the consequences of his decision to represent himself and the evidence was sufficient to support the verdicts.
|
|||||
| McGee v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7808, No. 4604,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 14, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the superior court revoked defendant's probation on a ground not alleged in the State's petition to revoke, defendant's due process rights were violated, and the superior court's revocation order was vacated.
|
|||||
| Windham v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7945, No. 4606,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 14, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was not entitled to a mistrial where a police sergeant testified that, on one occasion, defendant had refused to talk to him where a curative instruction was given and defendant had not consistently exercised his right to remain silent.
|
|||||
| Osmar v. Mahan, Supreme Court No. S-10299, No. 5608,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, August 16, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Children's insurance benefits for daughter of prior marriage were substitute for child support; thus, benefits were not income to mother and should have been excluded from mother's income in calculating child support for child of later marriage.
|
|||||
| State v. Prince, Court of Appeals No. A-7681, No. 1817,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 16, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Criminal indictment was reinstated because even though the criminal acts occurred on a state-owned river within the city, defendant was subject to state statutes that forbade violation of city restrictions on importation and possession of alcohol.
|
|||||
| State v. Simpson, Court of Appeals No. A-8028, No. 1818,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 16, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because Montana's driving under the influence statute was similar to Alaska's driving while intoxicated (DWI) statute, defendant's prior convictions under Montana law were properly used as predicate convictions to support a felony DWI charge.
|
|||||
| Williams v. Abood, Supreme Court No. S-9806/9836, No. 5607,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, August 16, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Workers' compensation board was entitled to reject the late-filed affidavits of employee's attorney in request for fees, and where properly filed affidavit was incomprehensible, board did not err in awarding statutory minimum in fees.
|
|||||
| Moeller-Prokosch v. Prokosch, Supreme Court No. S-10486, No. 5614,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, August 19, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In child custody action, it was impermissible to count mother's move to Florida as a negative best-interests factor if her reasons for moving were legitimate and not primarily motivated by a desire to make visitation for father more difficult.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
