 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Barrington v. Alaska Communs. Sys. Group, Inc., Supreme Court No. S-12609, No. 6321,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, October 24, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Alaska Workers' Compensation Board should have joined employee's physician as party to her claim before it approved settlement, Alaska Stat. ¿ 23.30.030(4); by not giving physician notice of the settlement and opportunity to present a claim, the board denied him the opportunity to show that the medical care he provided was reasonable and necessary.
|
|||||
| Pastos v. State, Supreme Court No. S-12745, No. 6319,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, October 24, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petitioner's act of negotiating a check the victim wrote him three years earlier did not constitute "contact" in violation of condition of release because while the bank's processing of the check had an effect on the victim, petitioner's act, occurring via a standardized and impersonal banking transaction, carried little communicative value.
|
|||||
| Robertson v. Riplett, Supreme Court No. S-12800, No. 6320,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, October 24, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Father sought to modify Ohio court's orders with respect to visitation of his children. Superior court lacked jurisdiction to modify the orders under Alaska Stat. ¿ 25.30.320 because the Ohio court had not relinquished exclusive jurisdiction and because the father still resided in Ohio.
|
|||||
| Beegan v. State, Supreme Court No. S-12615, No. 6322,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, October 31, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee's claim for back pay was not barred because he did not have the opportunity to assert the claim before the Human Rights Commission; the employee did not control his claim for back pay, he did not have a full and fair opportunity to litigate it, and therefore, res judicata did not preclude him from pursuing the claim in superior court.
|
|||||
| Harris v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-9548, No. 2190,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, October 31, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a criminal trial, the judge properly restricted expert testimony as a discovery sanction under Alaska R. Crim. P. 16(c)(4), and was not required to impose a continuance instead, because, in addition to finding bad faith, the judge found that lesser sanctions would not cure the prejudice to the State and would not ensure future compliance.
|
|||||
| State v. Batts, Court of Appeals No. A-9682, No. 2189,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, October 31, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Alaska R. Evid. 412 was unconstitutional under the Alaska Constitution to the extent that it permitted impeachment in cases where the violation of Miranda was either intentional or egregious - meaning a violation that would have been obvious to any reasonable police officer.
|
|||||
| Lewis v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-9867, No. 2191,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, November 7, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant waived Fifth Amendment privilege to object to psychiatric evaluations under Alaska Stat. ¿ 12.47.070 by putting mental health at issue by asserting behavior was attributable to ingestion of drug and arguing at trial that because of underlying mental diseases he lacked culpable mental states for third-degree assault.
|
|||||
| Hinson v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-9725, No. 2196,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, November 28, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Schwab v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-9958, No. 2197,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, November 28, 2008, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
