|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Alaska - October 24 - November 28, 2008
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Harris v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-9548, No. 2190,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, October 31, 2008, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: In a criminal trial, the judge properly restricted expert testimony as a discovery sanction under Alaska R. Crim. P. 16(c)(4), and was not required to impose a continuance instead, because, in addition to finding bad faith, the judge found that lesser sanctions would not cure the prejudice to the State and would not ensure future compliance.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|