 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| A.K. v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7824, No. 4425,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 1, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where juvenile court found that juvenile's delinquency disposition would have been the same without inclusion of past allegations of delinquent behavior, the court did not improperly rely on such information.
|
|||||
| Coronell v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7630, No. 4422,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 1, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea was properly denied, as trial court's factual finding that defendant understood his plea, and that he was attempting to manipulate the system by withdrawing it, was not clearly erroneous.
|
|||||
| Gernandt v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7563, No 4421,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 1, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Juror's found the victim's testimony that she asked the defendant to stop his sexual advances more credible than the defendant's evidence, and therefore it was sufficient to convict the defendant.
|
|||||
| Kompkoff v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7889, No. 4426,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 1, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The defendant's criminal history of assaultive behavior which was similar to the charged offense, failure on probation, and poor prospects for rehabilitation, justified imposing a sentence beyond the presumptive range.
|
|||||
| Mogan v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7657, No. 4427,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 1, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial judge did not abuse his discretion when he found that defendant had not proved a fair and just reason to withdraw his plea. Finding that defendant was attempting to manipulate the system and delay the case was not erroneous.
|
|||||
| Sakar v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7554, No. 4429,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 1, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant convicted of assault was entitled to have the court reconsider his motion for withdrawal of his guilty plea under the fair and just reason standard where he had properly filed his motion before sentencing.
|
|||||
| Seibert v. Municipality of Anchorage, Court of Appeals No. A-7703, No. 4423,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 1, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err refusing to suppress evidence as facts and circumstances observed by the officer were based on trustworthy information and the officer had probable cause to arrest defendant for DWI and refusal.
|
|||||
| Zaukar v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7794, No. 4424,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 1, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence was not excessive because, based on the seriousness of the defendant's current offense and his extensive criminal record, it was necessary to emphasize extensive imprisonment to protect the public.
|
|||||
| Hallam v. Holland Am. Line, Supreme Court No. S-9144, No. 5444,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, August 3, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant a class certification to a pro se plaintiff because a pro se plaintiff could not adequately represent the interests of the other class members.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
