 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bowell v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7656, No. 4436,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 22, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Probation officer's testimony describing defendant's failure to contact the probation office monthly and to successfully complete a required mental health evaluation provided substantial evidence to support revocation of probation.
|
|||||
| Gloria v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7717, No. 4434,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 22, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in not considering whether evidence of defendant's two prior assault convictions was more prejudicial than probative before admitting it, but error was not prejudicial as she did not show jury improperly considered it.
|
|||||
| Guthrie v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7770, No. 4435,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 22, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence of scratches on prisoner's hand were properly admitted in his assault conviction where he had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his cell, and the search for the attacker was an emergency.
|
|||||
| Hammock v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7379, No. 4437,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 22, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Fourth informant's tip provided enough detail for trial court to infer informant's knowledge was based on more than casual rumor or general reputation. Level of detail found sufficient for inference of personal knowledge.
|
|||||
| Johnson v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7636, No. 4433,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 22, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction was remanded because the trial court erred in denying the admission of the hearsay statements on the ground of unreliability, and the denial was prejudicial to the defendant.
|
|||||
| Knix v. State, Court of Appeals Nos. A-7391, A-7607, No. 4438,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 22, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was not entitled to credit for time served in house arrest, and he failed to show ineffective assistance of counsel because he failed to file an affidavit from his trial counsel or to explain why the affidavit could not be obtained.
|
|||||
| Millard v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7629, No. 4439,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 22, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Police officer's need to restrain upset wife from entry into residence where guns were admittedly kept involved plausible officer safety claim, and thus, brief restraint of her and defendant did not violate defendant's constitutional rights.
|
|||||
| Baker v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7675, No. 1761,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 24, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not have to impose all three years of defendant's breath test sentence consecutively with his DWI sentence as statutory language requiring consecutive sentencing only referred to mandatory minimum sentences that could be imposed.
|
|||||
| GILLUM v. L & J ENTERPRISES, Supreme Court No. S-9669, No. 5455,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, August 24, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in relying on special master's findings that the driver's subsequent injury was not caused by dizziness attributable to a prior accident where the driver's testimony was not credible.
|
|||||
| Simeon v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7335, Court of Appeals No. A-7487, No. 4440,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, August 29, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Alaska's statutory speedy trial limit was properly tolled where attorney for one defendant could not appear for trial due to a schedule conflict, and defendants' trials were not severed because they involved the same evidence and witnesses.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
