 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Armstrong v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8129, No. 4760,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, September 24, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's convictions related to sexual assault were affirmed, as there were no errors regarding indictment, victim's testimony supported Glass warrant, and evidence of victim's claimed prior false report of sexual assault was properly barred.
|
|||||
| Ashepak v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8359, No. 4764,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, September 24, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sexual assault conviction was affirmed because evidence was sufficient based on victim's testimony that defendant had non-consensual sexual intercourse with her, and maximum sentence was proper based on history of sexual assault.
|
|||||
| Bowles v. Jones, Supreme Court No. S-10986, No. 1142,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, September 24, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Superior court did not abuse its discretion in allowing the father to change his position on the paternity issue, but where the presumptive father had had a vasectomy, the record revealed no finding of good cause to have dispensed with the test.
|
|||||
| Charles v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8073, No. 4762,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, September 24, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate was entitled to an additional 22 days of good time credit, where the inmate failed to demonstrate that the Alaska Department of Corrections' current calculations were otherwise improperly unfavorable to him.
|
|||||
| Mullin v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8200, No. 4763,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, September 24, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate failed to show that trial counsel's failure to challenge an allegedly biased juror was an unreasonable tactical decision, and post-conviction relief counsel was not required to explain why certain claims were not pursued.
|
|||||
| Tocktoo v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8295, No. 4765,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, September 24, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Post-conviction relief was properly denied, as appellant validly waived counsel, where judge addressed him at length about disadvantages of representing himself and potential problem of unavailability of other counsel was made clear to him.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
