 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Rush v. State, Supreme Court No. S-10926, No. 5831,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, September 17, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The department of natural resources properly applied a former statute when considering the affect of an auction of public lands where a later amendment to the statute would have affected the lessee's substantive property rights.
|
|||||
| Ahgook v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8577, No. 4929,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, September 29, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the trial court improperly found and applied a statutory aggravating factor in considering defendant's sentence, the appellate court vacated the sentence and remanded the matter for a new sentencing hearing.
|
|||||
| Crawford v. Drvenkar, Supreme Court No. S-11180, No. 1183,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, September 29, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: On citizen's appeal from adverse judgment in civil rights violation case, judgment was affirmed; search of citizen and passenger compartment was lawful as troopers had reason to believe he was armed and dangerous--the safety warning provided reason.
|
|||||
| Ogar v. Weise, Supreme Court No. S-10897, No. 1182,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, September 29, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: On wife's appeal of judgment enforcing property award, judgment was affirmed; she could not collaterally attack underlying divorce order in challenging enforcement order and trial court had broad discretion to enforce its own divorce decree.
|
|||||
| Tok O v. Municipality of Anchorage, Court of Appeals No. A-8348, No. 4930,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, September 29, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: On defendant's appeal of reckless driving conviction, judgment was affirmed; in driving against oncoming traffic and accelerating to get ahead of the vehicles blocking his access, he forced oncoming motorist to slow abruptly, leading to a collision.
|
|||||
| Woodard v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8243, No. 4931,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, September 29, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The State was entitled to withhold the identity of an informant where the informant played no part in the criminal act with which defendant had been charged, and defendant was not entitled to additional discovery regarding the informant.
|
|||||
| Allstate Ins. Co. v. Teel, Supreme Court No. S-11039, No. 5832,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, October 1, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An insurance policy language clearly did not exclude the insured mother from UM/UIM coverage to recover for negligent infliction of emotional distress resulting from the death of her son, an occupant of an insured vehicle.
|
|||||
| Moeller-Prokosch v. Prokosch, Supreme Court No. S-11146, No. 5834,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, October 1, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the superior court ordered that the father would gain primary physical custody over the parties' minor child if the mother moved to Florida, the court erred by failing to consider the detriment to the child if he were separated from his mother.
|
|||||
| State v. Semancik, Supreme Court No. S-10846, No. 5833,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, October 1, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The Supreme Court of Alaska overruled case law permitting a defendant to challenge the State's failure to specify defendant's intended crime in a burglary indictment for the first time on appeal. A defect of form had to be raised in the trial court.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
