 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bishop v. Clark, Supreme Court No. S-9232, No. 5626,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, September 13, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A later settlement agreement between the parties superseded an earlier agreement; it was necessary to consider the girlfriend's claim that she signed under duress. The parties agreed to share their property as though they were married.
|
|||||
| Murray v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7210, No. 1826,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, September 13, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The proximity of the firearm to the drugs was relevant to the trial court's nexus finding; the fact that the firearm and drugs were located in the same house was insufficient to establish the nexus.
|
|||||
| Nerox Power Sys. v. M-B Contr. Co., Supreme Court No. S-9922, No. 5628,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, September 13, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Finding the parent company was a mere instrumentality of its major shareholder allowed the power company's creditors to pierce the corporate veil and hold the major shareholder personally liable for the debts of the company and its parent.
|
|||||
| Pitka v. Interior Reg'l Hous. Auth., Supreme Court No. S-10152, No. 5627,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, September 13, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Criticism of employee's job performance and other management decisions did not, standing alone, create intolerable workplace conditions to support employee's claim that she was constructively discharged by employer.
|
|||||
| State v. Dist. Court, Court of Appeals No. A-8101, No. 1827,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, September 13, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The district court had no authority to reject a plea bargain between the State and defendant on the basis that the State could have proved a more serious charge against defendant.
|
|||||
| Dull v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8146, No. 4618,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, September 18, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In enhancing presumptive term and imposing composite sentence of three years for offenses of forgery and fourth-degree misconduct involving controlled substance, court properly considered defendant's prior convictions for forgery and theft.
|
|||||
| Martin v. State, Court of Appeals Nos. A-8060 & 8145, No. 4619,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, September 18, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant's time in treatment program before sentencing did not subject defendant to restrictions approximating incarceration, trial court did not err in denying defendant sentencing credit for the time spent in the treatment program.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
