 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Braund v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7083, No. 1703,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, November 9, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A defendant's convictions were reversed where the trial court improperly prevented a defendant from cross-examining a witness concerning the favorable treatment that the witness had received from the state.
|
|||||
| Brown v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7533, No. 1706,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, November 9, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Application of sentencing aggravator for seriousness of defendant's conduct was appropriate where trial court had properly relied on evidence from several sources indicating that defendant had been accomplice to homicide.
|
|||||
| Kingsley v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7288, No. 1704,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, November 9, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court concluded the jury need not make a finding of operability unless there is evidence suggesting the defendant's vehicle was both inoperable and not reasonably capable of being rendered operable.
|
|||||
| Lauth v. Department of Health & Soc. Servs., Supreme Court No. S-9096, No. 5327,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, November 9, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State's method for determining physical custody did not violate equal protection; difference in treatment of two categories of children amply justified by difference in economic circumstances, so denial of welfare benefits affirmed.
|
|||||
| Markgraf v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7432, No. 1705,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, November 9, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Police testimony that witness appeared to be scared was not hearsay; testimony that witness said he was scared was hearsay, but admissible to prove his then-existing state of mind.
|
|||||
| Powell v. State, Court of Appeals Nos. A-7114, and A-7143, No. 1701,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, November 9, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Letters written by an inmate to a halfway house were not coercive, since they did not compel a third party to act or refrain from action. They did not constitute third degree assault since they did not contain specific threats of personal harm.
|
|||||
| Sanders v. Barth, Supreme Court No. S-9184, No. 5328,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, November 9, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff in child support action that settled was not entitled to attorney's fees under Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure, as fees could not be awarded following consent judgment where parties had no agreement as to fees.
|
|||||
| Schlagel v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7538, No. 1702,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, November 9, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Fisherman's state conviction for setting a sea gillnet within a prescribed distance of another gillnet was reversed as State conceded that the trial court did not properly apply the first in time rule.
|
|||||
| Snook v. Bowers, Supreme Court Nos. S-8463/8464, No. 5329, Supreme Court No. 8633,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, November 9, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellees were properly adjudged sole owners of the disputed land, because they successfully acquired sole ownership through a valid quitclaim deed, specific performance, and adverse possession under color of title.
|
|||||
| Wilson v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7272, No. 1700,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, November 9, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of defendant's motion to unseal a search warrant affidavit was an abuse of discretion where most of the affidavit could have been edited and revealed to the defendant without disclosing the informant's identity.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
