 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Sheridan v. Municipality of Anchorage, Court of Appeals No. A-8617, No. 1952,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, October 29, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant attacked validity of prior DWI convictions, claiming statute under which he was convicted had been found unconstitutional, his claim failed, as his prior convictions were not prosecuted under that statute, but under city ordinance.
|
|||||
| Alaska Cmty. Colleges' Fedn. of Teachers v. Univ. of Alaska, Supreme Court No. S-11193, No. 1190,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, November 3, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In labor litigation, union defended arbitration award. On appeal, only issue was award of attorney fees to university. Award was presumptively correct and it was affirmed because union failed to show convincing evidence that award was unreasonable.
|
|||||
| Bright v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8804, No. 4941,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, November 3, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's five year sentence for possession of OxyContin with intent to deliver was proper; trial judge did not err in rejecting mitigating factor for defendant playing minor role, as defendant delivered 20 pills over four separate transactions.
|
|||||
| Brown v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8424, No. 4942,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, November 3, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In trial for murder, prosecutor's challenge of juror was not violative of Batson, as prosecutor offered race-neutral reasons. Pathologist's testimony about intent to kill was harmless, if error at all, as defendant offered alibi defense.
|
|||||
| Copeland v. State, Supreme Court No. S-10436, No. 1189,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, November 3, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Individual, who challenged oil discharge prevention and contingency plans that were approved by an environmental agency, was not entitled to attorney's fees, as he was not prevailing party under catalyst theory.
|
|||||
| Lyttaker v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8524, No. 4943,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, November 3, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a request for post-conviction relief, defendant attempted to argue that counsel rendered ineffective assistance. Trial court properly denied the request, as defendant failed to overcome presumption that attorney's actions were competent.
|
|||||
| Weber v. State, Supreme Court No. S-11082, No. 1188,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, November 3, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a modification of child support, an agency did not abuse its discretion in raising the amount of child support a father had to pay, although two of three children had moved in with him, as father never petitioned for modification of child custody.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
