 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Park v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7356, No. 4308,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, November 15, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An officer's knowledge of appellant's relationship to a cocaine dealer provided sufficient suspicion to support an investigative stop outside the dealer's home.
|
|||||
| Fairbanks North Star Borough Assessor's Office v. Golden Heart Utils., Inc., Supreme Court Nos. S-9120/9179, No. 5334,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, November 17, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Assessor may tax possessory interest in tax-exempt property. Use of reversionary method to determine assessed value of leasehold interest in tax-exempt property was reasonable.
|
|||||
| Griffith v. Taylor, Supreme Court No. S-8970, No. 5333,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, November 17, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where client failed to notify law firm of new basis of alleged liability in expert witness statement, but waited until three months before legal malpractice trial, trial court did not err by precluding client from using information.
|
|||||
| Hikita v. Nichiro Gyogyo Kaisha, Supreme Court No. S-8121, No. 5330,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, November 17, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Earlier litigation between appellee and appellant's shareholder did not preclude the instant action. Dismissal with prejudice was too harsh a sanction for appellant's discovery misconduct.
|
|||||
| Martinez v. Ha, Supreme Court No. S-9227, No. 5332,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, November 17, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because only evidence before trial court was expert advisory report stating that there was no evidence that patient's injury was caused by unskillful care, trial court properly granted summary judgment in favor of physician.
|
|||||
| Stosh's I/M v. Fairbanks North Star Borough, Supreme Court No. S-8887, No. 5331,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, November 17, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because mechanic and station was under "heightened scrutiny" resulting from his previous failures to comply with pollution emission standards, agency did not violate its own procedures in choosing to conduct covert audit.
|
|||||
| Green v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7361, No. 4310,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, November 22, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Even if it was error to admit the hearsay statement, the error was harmless because the evidence was essentially uncontradicted that the truck appellant had been driving was the same vehicle that the officer had been chasing.
|
|||||
| Tagle v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7132, No. 4309,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, November 22, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence obtained should have been suppressed and search warrant should not have issued where facts did not establish probable cause to believe drugs or evidence of drug trafficking would be found in appellant's vehicle.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
