 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Disotell v. Stiltner, Supreme Court No. S-10984, No. 5841,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, November 5, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: On partner's appeal of trial court's method of winding up partnership, buyout was affirmed because the trial court's effort to avoid further loss to both partners justified its decision.
|
|||||
| Dunn v. Municipality of Anchorage, Court of Appeals No. A-8677, No. 1953,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, November 5, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Drunk driving laws were not unconstitutional for considering convictions more than 10 years old for sentencing purposes because there were rational inferences linking driver's lifetime DWI convictions with increased risk of traffic accidents.
|
|||||
| Fred Meyer of Alaska, Inc. v. Bailey, Supreme Court Nos. S-10958/S-10968, No. 5840,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, November 5, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court affirmed trial court's finding that employee was not exempt for purposes of Alaska Wage and Hour Act; trial court found that employee approached 60 percent of his time performing non-management tasks, making it clear that he was not exempt.
|
|||||
| Way v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8633, No. 1954,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, November 5, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trooper had probable cause to stop defendant's vehicle, as license plates were not clearly legible and stop was not pretextual, as stop was based on a legitimate law enforcement objective, to identify vehicle and to enforce license plate statute.
|
|||||
| Phillips v. Alaska, Court of Appeals No. A-7428, No. 4944,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, November 10, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in imposing a composite sentence that exceeded 99-year maximum penalty for second-degree murder because that offense was not governed by presumptive sentencing; thus, judge was not limited to statutory aggravating factors.
|
|||||
| Swenning v. Municipality of Anchorage, Court of Appeals No. A-8637, No. 4945,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, November 10, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was convicted of DWI, with seven prior convictions; a 360-day sentence was mandatory. Defendant's brief on appeal was inadequate because he failed to attack district court's ruling on its merits; his prior convictions were presumed valid.
|
|||||
| Lakosh v. Alaska Dep't of Envtl. Conservation, Supreme Court No. S-11014, No. 1191,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, November 10, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In matter challenging regulations promulgated by environmental agency, trial court did not abuse discretion in denying individual's motion to amend his pleading to add a claim because individual was not prejudiced by the ruling.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
