 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| ERA Aviation, Inc. v. Lindfors, Supreme Court No. S-9062, S-9072, No. 5335,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, November 24, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment for professional employee in gender discrimination and retaliation lawsuit was affirmed, but remittitur was ordered to reduce excessive punitive damages award. Jury instruction error was harmless.
|
|||||
| Howarth v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7331, No. 1708,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, November 24, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of motion for reconsideration of denial of post-conviction relief was reversed because there was reason to believe defendant had not received adequate representation.
|
|||||
| Thompson v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7448, No. 1707,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, November 24, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of appellant's attempts to obtain new trial or reduction of life sentence were affirmed, as his motions were untimely and he did not qualify for any exception.
|
|||||
| Fuzzard v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7206, No. 1709,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, December 1, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a domestic violence matter, in which defendant was convicted for threatening the victim, trial court did not erroneously admit evidence of other acts of misconduct. Evidentiary rule did not violate equal protection.
|
|||||
| Glasen v. Glasen, Supreme Court No. S-8943, No. 5337,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, December 1, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to set aside separation agreement was proper where decree was interlocutory, parties' later reconciliation terminated agreement, and it did not meet the fair and reasonable test or survive equitable estoppel analysis.
|
|||||
| Laverty v. Alaska R.R. Corp., Supreme Court Nos. S-8951/9071/9081, No. 5338,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, December 1, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Declaration that Alaska Railroad Corporation was subject to Public Notice Clause was affirmed; however, case was remanded to enter declaratory judgment where permit process failed to give adequate prior notice of contract to extract gravel.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
