 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Crouse v. Municipality of Anchorage, Court of Appeals No. A-8434, No. 1905,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, November 7, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a trial judge knew immediately that the verdict was not the jury's unanimous decision and that verdict forms were switched, he properly inquired into jurors' intent and sent them back into deliberations with proper verdict forms.
|
|||||
| Friends of Cooper Landing v. Kenai Peninsula Borough, Supreme Court No. S-10581, No. 5749,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, November 7, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a case involving land classification, both state law and the borough code allowed a group, which challenged an adjudicatory decision of the Kenai Peninsula Borough Board of Adjustment, to appeal the board's decision to the superior court.
|
|||||
| State v. Wagar, Supreme Court No. S-10369, No. 5750,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, November 7, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: To justify a further examination of an unknown object felt in a pat-down frisk for weapons, an officer needed a reasonable belief that the object could have been used as a weapon, not that the object was an atypical weapon.
|
|||||
| Ferguson v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8470, No. 4792,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, November 12, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant had been speeding, showed signs of intoxication, and failed at least certain portions of a field sobriety test, an officer had probable cause to arrest defendant and his refusal to submit conviction was affirmed.
|
|||||
| Plyler v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8249, No. 4791,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, November 12, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial judge's questions to expert were designed to clarify expert's testimony and expressed no opinion on the evidence; thus, attorney was not incompetent for not objecting to judge's questions and post-conviction relief petition was properly denied.
|
|||||
| Freitas v. Alaska Radiology Assocs., Supreme Court No. S-10487, No. 5753,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, November 14, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was no abuse of discretion in admitting testimony from clinic's director about the practices followed in positioning patients during mammograms and technician training. This was not opinion evidence that needed to be disclosed before trial.
|
|||||
| K & K Recycling, Inc. v. Alaska Gold Co., Supreme Court No. S-10303, Supreme Court No. S-10324, No. 5752,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, November 14, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a dispute regarding a contract to purchase a dredge, material factual issues existed as to which items were dredge equipment and related facilities; hence, the trial court erred in granting summary judgment with respect to personal property.
|
|||||
| Noy v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8327, No. 1906,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, November 14, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A court would not grant a rehearing of its decision that a statute criminalizing possession of any amount of marijuana was an unconstitutional restriction on a person's privacy right to possess marijuana for personal use in the home.
|
|||||
| Samaniego v. City of Kodiak, Supreme Court No. S-10378, No. 5751,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, November 14, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In arrestee's suit against a city, a police officer, and an immigration officer alleging use of excessive force during her arrest, application of Daubert standard was not prerequisite to admission of testimony stemming from typical psychiatric exam.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
