Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - Alaska - November 9, 2006

  
Cleary v. Smith, Supreme Court No. S-11646, No. 6068, SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, November 9, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where adult prisoners resolved their equal protection claims with the State of Alaska and the Federal Bureau of Prisons (FBOP) by entering into a settlement agreement, the agreement did not prevent the transfer of an Alaska prisoner to a non-FBOP facility in Arizona.

Search Cases for Free

  
Cleary v. Smith, Supreme Court No. S-11646, SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, November 9, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Peter A. v. State, Supreme Court No. S-12119, No. 6070, SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, November 9, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: In an adjudication of children in need of aid, pursuant to Alaska Stat. ?? 47.10.011(6), (9), and (10), a father's appeal was moot because the State voluntarily dismissed the matter after the adjudication order and no live controversy remained. Also, the father would not suffer collateral consequences because the order was vacated.

Search Cases for Free

  
State v. Parker, Supreme Court No. S-11503, No. 6071, SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, November 9, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant was sentenced for exploitation of a minor and possession of child pornography. Lower appellate court improperly determined that mitigating factor under Alaska Stat. ? 12.55.155(d)(9) (former) was proper because, even though conduct in taking pictures of 16 year old was not most serious, it did not follow that conduct was "least serious."

Search Cases for Free

  
W. States Fire Prot. Co. v. Municipality of Anchorage, Supreme Court No. S-11895, No. 6069, SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, November 9, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: In a review of dispute between sprinkler installer of high school auditorium's sprinkler system and fire department, board of building examiners' decision, pursuant to Anchorage, Alaska, Municipal Code ? 23.45.100, was inadequate because decision failed to address crucial question--whether sprinklers would provide adequate water coverage.

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top