 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bartek v. State, Supreme Court Nos. S-9084, S-9263, No. 5473,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, September 21, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As well as granting class certification, the trial court dismissed the case. The appellate court reversed the dismissal; on remand, trial court was to reconsider certification order and whether to hold a hearing or permit discovery before ruling.
|
|||||
| Rhines v. State, Supreme Court No. S-9475, No. 5472,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, September 21, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Occupational disability benefits were properly denied where the employee could not show that her termination was due to her disability, nor that her injuries were permanent.
|
|||||
| Sampson v. State, Supreme Court No. S-9338, No. 5474,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, September 21, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Alaska's manslaughter statute was not unconstitutional as applied to physicians assisting terminally ill patients to commit suicide; therefore, the addition of an exemption for physicians from the statute was not warranted.
|
|||||
| State v. Martin, Court of Appeals Nos. A-8040, & 8051, No. 1765,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, September 21, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court of appeals stayed State's motion to dismiss its appeal of the dismissal of charges against the defendant where there was an important jurisdictional question that needed to be answered by the supreme court before the court of appeals ruled.
|
|||||
| Wagar v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7160, No. 4458,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, September 26, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The State failed to offer affirmative reasons, specific and articulable facts, to support a reasonable belief the unknown object detected during a search of defendant's person under an investigatory stop was indeed an atypical weapon.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
