 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Baskurt v. Beal, Supreme Court No. S-11060, No. 5848,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, November 26, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err when it set aside foreclosure sale on basis, inter alia, of inadequate purchase price, where foreclosure purchase price of $ 26,781 was less than 15 percent of sale price, indicating that gross inadequacy standard was met.
|
|||||
| Howard v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8491, No. 1960,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, November 26, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's hiding in the woods and the trooper's contact with only a piece of defendant's jacket or cuff while he was running away was not sufficient to constitute force; thus, evidence was insufficient to support his resisting arrest conviction.
|
|||||
| Knutsen v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8471, No. 1958,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, November 26, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an indecent photography case, a court did not err in failing to instruct on a defense because no issue of consent was presented, and therefore, even assuming defendant was unaware that minors would be changing their clothes, that was no defense.
|
|||||
| Miller v. Safeway, Inc., Supreme Court No. S-11101, No. 5849,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, November 26, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A grocery store's hair grooming policy did not violate the constitutional right of privacy of a Native Indian employee, because there was no state action; the employee also failed to demonstrate discrimination on the basis of race, sex, or religion.
|
|||||
| Riggins v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8701, No. 1959,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, November 26, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because trial court erred in admitting evidence of defendant's assaults on a prior girlfriend, the court reversed defendant's conviction for assault in the second degree for striking his current girlfriend in the face with a dangerous instrument.
|
|||||
| Western Star Trucks, Inc. v. Big Iron Equip. Serv., Supreme Court No. S-10807, No. 5847,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, November 26, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court correctly applied Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Act to a transaction between dealer and manufacturer and found that manufacturer misrepresented the consequences of the oral agreement that it made with the dealer.
|
|||||
| Nason v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8164, No. 1961,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, December 3, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in determining that victim's consent to search her cabin was valid where she did not simply acquiesce but gave the officer directions on how to get there and how to avoid problems with her dogs.
|
|||||
| Nason v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8673, No. 1962,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, December 3, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court upheld Alaska's DNA collection statute against Fourth Amendment and privacy concerns. An earlier version of the statute requiring DNA samples from those convicted of felonies against a person did not violate the equal protection clause.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
