|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Alaska - December 20, 2006
|
| |
|
| |
Douglas v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8934, No. 5155,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, December 20, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Although defendant's sentence for his robbery conviction was final, it was fundamentally unfair for a trial court to deny defendant's motion under Alaska R. Crim. P. 35(a) to challenge the aggravating factors of Alaska Stat. § 12.55.155(c)(3), (6), (14), and (22) that increased his sentence without considering the Blakely rule.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Woodbury v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-9402, No. 5153,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, December 20, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Defendant entered a no contest plea to a felony DUI charge. Although there was a potential problem, defendant conceded an aggravating factor, pursuant to Alaska Stat. § 12.55.155(c)(20). Trial court properly denied defendant's motion to correct sentence because, among other things, defendant did not raise Blakely objection at sentencing.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|