 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Hansen, Arizona Supreme Court No. SB-00-0084-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, January 11, 2001, Decided , January 11, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where attorney was found to have committed ethical violations such as failure to complete client matters, failure to communicate with his clients, and failure to return unearned fees, attorney was suspended for 60 days.
|
|||||
| Snyder v. Tucson Police Pub. Safety Personnel Retirement Sys. Bd., Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-00-0034-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, January 11, 2001, Decided , January 11, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Huser, Arizona Supreme Court No. SB-00-0108-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, January 12, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Respondent, a member of the State Bar of Arizona, was censured for conduct in violation of his duties and obligations as a lawyer. Judgment was granted against respondent for costs and expenses.
|
|||||
| Sabori v. Kuhn, 1 CA-CV 99-0460,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT B, January 13, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The rules of civil procedure did not unconditionally require a personal appearance at an arbitration hearing by a party who wished to preserve the right to appeal. Telephonic testimony was acceptable and proper in arbitrations.
|
|||||
| State v. Bomar, 1 CA-CR 99-0792,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, January 16, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant was not entitled to pre-sentence incarceration credit against period of hospital commitment following a finding that he was guilty-except-insane; release depended upon mental recovery, not completion of a particular sentence.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
