 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Gipson v. Kasey, Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-06-0100-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, January 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In mother's wrongful death suit, coworker did owe a duty of care to decedent, to whom coworker had given prescription drugs, because Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-2531(A)(6), Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 32-1961(A), and Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-3408(A)(5), prohibited distribution of prescription drugs to persons not covered under prescription.
|
|||||
| Doe v. Arpaio, 1 CA-CV 05-0835,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT C, January 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A superior court properly concluded that a county policy requiring a court order before transporting an inmate for an elective abortion did not serve a penological interest where, inter alia, there was no evidence of an increased security risk, a financial impact on the county, or increased county liability.
|
|||||
| Estate of Winn v. Plaza Healthcare, Inc. (In re Estate of Winn), Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-06-0076-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, January 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 14-3108(4) did not preclude a late-appointed personal representative from bringing an otherwise timely Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 46-455(B) (Supp. 2006) claim on behalf of a deceased victim's estate as that result comported with the statute's plain language and served the goal of protecting vulnerable adults.
|
|||||
| Lennar Corp. v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co., 1 CA-CV 03-0451, 1 CA-CV 03-0593, 1 CA-CV 03-0715, 1 CA-CV 03-0804, 1 CA-CV 04-0327, (Consolidated),
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT D, January 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court erred in granting summary judgment to the insurers on a developer's breach of contract claim as an underlying claim that property damage resulted from faulty construction was sufficient to allege an occurrence under the commercial general liability policies and the policies covered the natural consequences of negligent construction.
|
|||||
| State v. Gay, 2 CA-CR 2004-0306,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT A, January 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion to suppress under Ariz. Const. art. II, § 8 because (1) when his girlfriend would not consent to a search of their apartment, officers left to get a warrant; (2) one officer was left behind to ensure that she did not destroy evidence; and (3) exigency existed, but it was not created by police.
|
|||||
| In re Jerry C., 1 CA-JV 06-0104,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT A, January 25, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In appeal of adjudication of sexual conduct with minor, a violation of Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-1405, and molestation of a child, a violation of Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-1410, juvenile court properly determined that molestation was lesser included offense of which juvenile could be adjudicated because charging documents put juvenile on sufficient notice.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
