|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Arizona - February 28 - March 6, 2002
|
| |
Cummins v. Mold-In Graphic Sys., 1 CA-CV 99-0559,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, February 28, 2002, Decided , February 28, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Haas v. Colosi, 1 CA-SA 01-0160, 1 CA-SA 01-0163, 1 CA-SA 01-0165,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT B, February 28, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Public defender was obligated to represent indigent juveniles in incorrigibility proceedings when appointed by the court, even if there was no risk of detention.
|
|
| |
|
| |
In re Barragan, Supreme Court No. SB-02-0039-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, March 5, 2002, Decided , March 5, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Attorney was censured and placed on probation for two years, where client's medical malpractice action was dismissed, as he had not conducted discovery, and same client's personal injury claim was barred by the statute of limitations.
|
|
| |
In re Coker, Supreme Court No. SB-02-0045-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, March 5, 2002, Decided , March 5, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Attorney was censured where, relying solely on information provided by client, he filed pleading alleging that judge, guardian ad litem, and previous trial attorney were paid off by opposing counsel, allowing them to satisfy their mortgages.
|
|
| |
In re Estrada, Supreme Court No. SB-02-0044-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, March 5, 2002, Decided , March 5, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Attorney representing clients on numerous matters was censured, inter alia, for failure to respond to status inquiries by medical providers and failure to advise providers that clients' cases settled; negligence caused little or no injury.
|
|
| |
In re Herbert, Supreme Court No. SB-02-0041-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, March 5, 2002, Decided , March 5, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Attorney was censured for representing couple regarding renovations to their home, and then, while wife was on a trip, signing a lease with the husband to rent the house and threatened the wife by filing a forcible detainer to have her removed.
|
|
| |
In re Moore, Supreme Court No. SB-02-0043-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, March 5, 2002, Decided , March 5, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Attorney was representing client in a domestic matter and was censured for, inter alia, making inquiries of client concerning personal matters of a sexual nature and embracing her upon arrival and departure, making the client uncomfortable.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Minh T. v. Ariz. Dep't of Econ. Sec., 1 CA-JV 01-0078,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT C, March 6, 2002, Decided , March 6, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback