LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Arizona - January 28 - February 16, 2000

  
In re Friedman, Arizona Supreme Court No. SB-99-0088-D, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, January 28, 2000, Decided , January 28, 2000, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Ventre, No. JC-00-0001, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, January 28, 2000, Decided , January 28, 2000, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Municipal judge publicly censured per his stipulate consent for failing to afford defendant right to be heard, making inappropriate ex parte contacts, and failing to recuse himself after such contacts.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Aaron v. Fromkin, 1 CA-CV 99-0063, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT C, February 1, 2000, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Plaintiffs' securities fraud claim was barred by statute of limitations because claim ran from time fraudulent practice was suspected, not from when damage was fully discovered; summary judgment denial was not appealable.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Jardanowski v. Indus. Comm'n, 1 CA-IC 98-0170, 1 CA-IC 99-0011, (Consolidated), COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT A, February 8, 2000, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Conviction of disability benefit theft under Arizona law section 13-1802(A)(3) did not satisfy section 23-1028(A) because elements of two offenses different; petitioners constitutionally entitled to workers' compensation.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Stout v. State Compensation Fund, 1 CA-CV 98-0652, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT B, February 8, 2000, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Under Arizona law, any settlement agreement of claims against a third party must be approved by the State Compensation Fund where workers' compensation benefits have already been paid to decedent's family.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Timothy M., 1 CA-JV 99-0064, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, February 10, 2000, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Appellant juvenile charged with delinquency was not entitled to specific performance on plea agreement offered in juvenile system; juvenile court was required to dismiss petition before charges could be filed in adult court.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Rutledge, 1 CA-CR 99-0182, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT C, February 10, 2000, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Where defendant used force to steal surviving victim's property, defendant was properly convicted of murdering decedent victim because robbery was committed by using force against anyone, not just owner of stolen property.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Wells Fargo Bank v. Arizona Laborers, Teamster and Cement Masons Local No. 395, 1 CA-CV 99-0184, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT C, February 11, 2000, filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Summers, No. SB-00-0004-D, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, February 15, 2000, Decided , February 15, 2000, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Disciplinary recommendation for respondent's violations of a Supreme Court rule, which was based on respondent's admissions, the American Bar Association Standards, and a proportionality analysis, was accepted.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Walters v. Maricopa County, Supreme Court No. CV-99-0332-PR, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, February 16, 2000, Decided , February 16, 2000, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.