 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bauza Holdings,L.L.C. v. Primeco, Inc., 1 CA-CV 99-0102, 1 CA-CV 99-0296, (Consolidated),
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT A, January 25, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Arizona's property tax lien statutes did not permit one tax lien certificate holder to foreclose the rights of a competing tax lien certificate holder. Foreclosure by one tax lienholder did not extinguish competing liens.
|
|||||
| State v. Carlos, 2 CA-CR 99-0546,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT A, January 25, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court denied appellant his Sixth Amendment right to compulsory process by precluding him from calling assault victim as a witness at his second trial before making inquiry to determine whether victim would cooperate if called.
|
|||||
| Ruelas v. Staff Builders Personnel Servs., Inc., 2 CA-CV 00-0005,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, January 30, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: General employer was not vicariously liable for the tortious conduct of lent employee nurses where plaintiff produced no evidence that general employer had the right to control the specific injury-causing activity.
|
|||||
| State v. Derello, 1 CA-CR 99-0955,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT A, January 30, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sentences ranging from 12 to 28 years were affirmed because after exclusion of the time defendant spent incarcerated, the 1975 and 1977 convictions were within the 10-year limit, and thus could be used for sentencing enhancement.
|
|||||
| Clouse v. State, Supreme Court No. CV-99-0023-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, February 1, 2001, Decided , February 1, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Clouse v. State, Supreme Court No. CV-99-0023--PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, February 1, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court correctly held that deputies could be liable only for gross negligence for failure to retain an arrestee; legislature did not exceed its authority when it adopted the provision granting qualified immunity.
|
|||||
| Havasu Springs Resort Co. v. La Paz County, 1 CA-TX 00-0012,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT T, February 1, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Viewed as a whole, the lease proved that appellant had only a possessory interest in the improvements and was therefore not responsible for the payment of ad valorem taxes.
|
|||||
| In re Lamont, Supreme Court No. SB-01-0016-RD,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, February 2, 2001, Decided , February 2, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was reprimanded for engaging in fraudulent conduct by having his secretary sign deeds as a witness, even though the attorney's client did not sign the deeds in the secretary's presence.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
