 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Clarke, Arizona Supreme Court No. SB-01-0192-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, February 22, 2002, Decided , February 22, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was suspended for six months for converting client trust account funds for his own personal use, he was not disbarred because his clients suffered no actual harm, and he promptly rectified the consequences of his misconduct.
|
|||||
| State v. Crowley, 2 CA-CR 01-0162,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT A, February 22, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err when it granted motion to suppress evidence that was found during a house search that was based on a warrant, which relied upon future acts that could have only come into being by actions of the police.
|
|||||
| Dillon v. Zeneca Corp., 2 CA-CV 2000-0207,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, February 26, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Farmers' asserted causes of action for breach of express warranty, misrepresentation, and strict product liability arising from damage to their alfalfa crop allegedly caused by an herbicide were preempted by federal law.
|
|||||
| In re Buffenstein, Arizona Supreme Court No. SB-01-0171-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, February 26, 2002, Decided , February 26, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where state bar investigation showed attorney failed, inter alia, to keep individual client ledger cards, duplicate deposit slips, and failed to keep personal funds separate from client funds, he was suspended for 30 days with probation.
|
|||||
| In re Kistler, Supreme Court No. SB-01-0189-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, February 26, 2002, Decided , February 26, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney engaged in unauthorized practice of law when he represented clients while on administrative suspension. He also failed to communicate with clients and generally neglected their representation. He was suspended for one year.
|
|||||
| In re Reilly, Arizona Supreme Court No. SB-01-0190-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, February 26, 2002, Decided , February 26, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney's most serious misconduct was the conversion of client funds and his false statements to clients after neglecting their cases, the presumptive sanction was disbarment, but attorney established significant mitigating factors.
|
|||||
| In re Ziman, Supreme Court No. SB-01-0195-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, February 26, 2002, Decided , February 26, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney assumed the representation from another attorney of 1 of 2 individuals, who were injured in a car accident, and was suspended from practice for 30 days when he took over 2 years to pay the other attorney for his work.
|
|||||
| Haas v. Colosi, 1 CA-SA 01-0160, 1 CA-SA 01-0163, 1 CA-SA 01-0165,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT B, February 28, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Public defender was obligated to represent indigent juveniles in incorrigibility proceedings when appointed by the court, even if there was no risk of detention.
|
|||||
| Pinedo v. Ariz. DOT, Cause No. 332902,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT A, February 28, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
