|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Arizona - April 21 - May 5, 2009
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
State v. Gonzalez, 1 CA-CR 07-0923,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT B, April 28, 2009, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Evidence supported defendant's conviction, pursuant to Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 28-622.01, because a reasonable juror could conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant wilfully fled or attempted to elude a law enforcement vehicle in pursuit. Defendant failed to stop, despite being pursued by a patrol car with its lights and sirens activated.
|
|
| |
|
| |
In re Engel, No. 1 CA-CV 07-0587,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT A, April 30, 2009, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In an action involving the modification of child support, the trial court erroneously attributed hypothetical income and child-care expenses to a voluntarily unemployed parent because the Arizona Child Support Guidelines, Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 25-320 app., did not support the use of such attribution to increase the burden on the employed parent.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
New Sun Bus. Park, LLC v. Yuma County, No. 1 CA-CV 08-0094,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, May 5, 2009, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Appointment of county zoning inspector had continuing validity despite amendment of Yuma County, Ariz., Ordinance § 401.00. Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 11-808(A) required deputy county zoning inspectors to be appointed by County of Board of Supervisors, validity of deputy's actions were proper as he acted in capacity of de factor deputy zoning inspector.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|