 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Hylton, 1 CA-CR 01-0631,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT A, March 14, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred when it placed Proposition 200 defendant, probation violator, on unsupervised probation for one year, when original standard probation term was for three years. Statute required reinstatement to probation with additional terms.
|
|||||
| Swanson v. Image Bank, 2 CA-CV 2001-0069,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT A, March 14, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Arizona had a fundamental policy of permitting a treble damage award, notwithstanding the parties' choice of another state's law to govern their agreement, when the employer's withholding of wages was unreasonable and in bad faith.
|
|||||
| Varsity Gold, Inc. v. Porzio, 1 CA-CV 01-0304,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT D, March 14, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where non-compete covenant's geographic limitation was overbroad, the covenant was unreasonable and could not be enforced as written against employee.
|
|||||
| In re Estate of Fishman, No. CV-01-0351-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, March 19, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Michael M. v. Ariz. Dep't of Econ. Sec., 2 CA-JV 2001-0076,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT A, March 19, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Juvenile court's order denying incarcerated father visitation rights with new born daughter was reversed, where there was no evidence to support trial court's "belief" that it was not in child's best interest to be taken to jail to visit father.
|
|||||
| Retter v. Retter (In re CVR 1997 Irrevocable Trust), 1 CA-CV 01-0283,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT A, March 19, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where beneficiary had opportunity to litigate trustee's conduct at hearing where trustee sought order forfeiting beneficiary's inheritance from two trusts, and beneficiary chose not to do so, that election was not a deprivation of right to sue.
|
|||||
| State v. Bass, No. CR-01-0439-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, March 19, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Young v. Johnson, No. CV-01-0366-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, March 19, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
