Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - Arizona - April 9 - April 19, 2002

  
In re Jorge D., 1 CA-JV 01-0045, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT D, April 9, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Juvenile confessed, during questioning by an officer in the school principal's office, to throwing a bottle at a school bus driver. Appellate court found that objective test for determining custody for Miranda purposes also applied to juveniles.

Search Cases for Free

  
State v. Tousignant, 1 CA-CR 01-0418, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT B, April 9, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant, who had violated his probation under a state statute that called for mandatory probation for drug offenders, wished to reject probation. Trial court erred, however, in accepting defendant's rejection. Probation was to be reinstated.

Search Cases for Free

  
Young v. Johnson, 1 CA-CV 00-0159, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, April 9, 2002, Decided , April 9, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Sherman v. City of Tempe, Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-01-0287-PR, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, April 12, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Former election law, which was the law under which a city conducted its general election, required the distribution of publicity pamphlets regarding a proposition 10 days before election day, not, "not less than 10 days before the election."

Search Cases for Free

  
State v. Huskie, 2 CA-CV 2001-0057, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT A, April 18, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: The trial court erroneously granted State's request for a judgment in amount of husband's child support arrearages plus interest; it had not been filed within three years of high school graduation, the emancipation of child.

Search Cases for Free

  
In re Oakley, Supreme Court No. SB-02-0075-D, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, April 19, 2002, Decided , April 19, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Attorney was censured where, inter alia, he failed to abide by clients' decisions regarding objectives of representation, failed to consult with them as to means by which objectives were to be pursued, and failed to act with reasonable diligence.

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top