 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Saenz, 2 CA-CR 99-0177-PR,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, April 6, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Respondent was not entitled to post-conviction new trial relief based on newly discovered evidence because it was clear from the record that respondent was aware of the evidence before the trial but chose not to reveal it.
|
|||||
| In re Perez, Comm. No. 00-0533,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, April 10, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Bohn v. Industrial Comm'n, Supreme Court No. CV-99-0076-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, April 11, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Forfeiture of workers' compensation claim was inappropriate penalty for unauthorized settlement with third party in context of denial of workers' compensation benefits, but claimant had burden to show amount was reasonable.
|
|||||
| In re Melissa K., 1 CA-JV 99-0155,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT A, April 13, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Disposition order relating to juvenile was vacated and case was remanded to determine whether juvenile was aware of rights she was waiving at time she entered admission to probation violation and relevant consequences.
|
|||||
| Schritter v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 1 CA-CV 99-0235,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT D, April 13, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court correctly awarded plaintiff costs as prevailing party in personal injury suit against insurance company, including costs for expert witness fees incurred in deposing her own expert witness.
|
|||||
| State ex rel. Napolitano v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Supreme Court No. CV-99-0444-T/AP,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, April 13, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Counties' motion to intervene in tobacco industry litigation to assert claim to share of settlement proceeds was properly denied; consent decree and final judgment were entered and intervention would prejudice both parties.
|
|||||
| Rita J. v. Arizona Dep't of Econ. Sec., 2 CA-JV 00-0005,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, April 18, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appeal from juvenile court order entered after permanency hearing was dismissed; order approving concurrent plans for severance of parental rights and reunification of family was interlocutory and an appealable order.
|
|||||
| Logerquist v. McVey, Supreme Court No. CV-98-0587-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, April 19, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Order precluding expert testimony of petitioner's alleged repressed memory in action involving sexual abuse was vacated; court found that Frye was inapplicable in this case.
|
|||||
| Parada v. Parada, Supreme Court No. CV-97-0520-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, April 19, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A former spouse was not a surviving spouse under her ex-husband's benefit plan and was not entitled to his death benefits, or a community property interest in the death benefits.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
