 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cable Plus Co., L.P. v. Arizona Dep't of Revenue, 1 CA-TX 99-0009,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT T, April 20, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Taxpayer received satellite transmissions, translated them into usable form and assigned them to a new carrier signal for cable transmission to subscribers. This was not intrastate telecommunication service taxable by state.
|
|||||
| State v. Marshall, 1 CA-CR 99-0105,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, April 20, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Convictions for sexual offenses were affirmed where failure to sever two counts was harmless, molestation statute included acts performed at appellant's direction, and lesser included charges as to age of victim were moot.
|
|||||
| In re Murphy, Arizona Supreme Court No. SB-00-0018-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, April 21, 2000, Decided , April 21, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Tandy, Arizona Supreme Court No. SB-00-0020-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, April 21, 2000, Decided , April 21, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| City of Tucson v. Tucson Hotel Equity Ltd. Pshp., 1 CA-TX 99-0016,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT T, April 25, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Hotel was not entitled to a refund of tax overpayments to the city for facsimile and laundry services which it charged guests without their knowledge, but hotel was entitled to a refund for telecommunications services.
|
|||||
| Forest Guardians v. Wells, 1 CA-CV 99-0258,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT D, April 25, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State official did not err in denying state land grazing leases to applicants who wished to rest lands from grazing for conservation purposes; applicants had not appropriately requested reclassification for commercial use.
|
|||||
| In re Sheree M., 1 CA-JV 99-0202,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT B, April 25, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The Arizona juvenile court had statutory authority to place an incorrigible juvenile on home detention, but lacked statutory authority to place her under juvenile intensive probation supervision.
|
|||||
| Lindquist v. Hart, 1 CA-CV 98-0323,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT D, April 25, 2000, Decided , April 25, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
