 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Romney, Arizona Supreme Court No. SB-01-0035-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, March 23, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where attorney committed numerous ethical violations during his practice of law because of severe depression and personal and financial problems, disciplinary commission suspended attorney from practicing law for 42 months.
|
|||||
| In re Weisling, Supreme Court No. SB-01-0038-D.,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, March 23, 2001, Dated , March 23, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An attorney was ordered to be suspended and to pay restitution to his clients where he took no action on two criminal matters, failed to communicate with his clients, lost a client file, and failed to respond to disciplinary authority.
|
|||||
| In re Harrington, Supreme Court No. SB-01-0058-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, March 27, 2001, Decided , March 27, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an attorney pled guilty to presenting of a false instrument for filing, the court adopted the disciplinary committee recommendation and censured the attorney, as well as assigning him costs of the investigation.
|
|||||
| ROSARITA MEXICAN FOODS v. INDUSTRIAL COMM'N OF ARIZONA, 1 CA-IC 00-0030,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT A, March 27, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A determination that an industrial injury is not yet stationary is a prerequisite for temporary disability. Equivocal medical testimony cannot support a finding that a claimant's condition is non-stationary.
|
|||||
| Residential Util. Consumer Office v. Arizona Corp. Comm'n, 1 CA-CC 99-0008,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, March 27, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Arizona Corporate Commission exceeded its constitutional rate-making authority when it authorized the surcharge. The surcharge did not qualify as an interim rate or an automatic adjustment.
|
|||||
| In re North, Arizona Supreme Court No. SB-01-0037-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, March 28, 2001, Decided , March 28, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was suspended for six months because he failed to disclose a conflict of interest, to provide information to his clients, to convey settlement offers to all plaintiffs, and to timely distribute an award to client.
|
|||||
| State v. Robinson, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0041-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, March 28, 2001, Decided , March 28, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
