LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Arizona - May 28 - June 7, 2004

  
In re Peasley, Arizona Supreme Court No. SB-03-0015-D, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, May 28, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Attorney's intentional elicitation of false testimony against two defendants in a capital murder trial and re-presentation of the same false testimony in a retrial of one of the defendants was sufficient misconduct to disbar him.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Medders v. Conlogue, 2 CA-SA 2004-0017, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, May 28, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Petitioner, who had been indicted, appeared before a judge, who was not assigned to the case, seeking to modify release conditions. When same judge was later reassigned to the case, petitioner did not waive right to peremptorily change that judge.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Guilliams, 2 CA-CR 2002-0251-PR, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, May 28, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: On defendant's appeal from a restitution order in favor of a prison, the case was remanded for recalculation of the restitution order; statutes directed award of restitution only for damages that flowed directly from defendant's criminal conduct.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Jackson, 2 CA-CR 2002-0391, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, May 28, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court misapplied statute of limitations in dismissing charges against defendant, as it failed to determine whether State discovered or reasonably should have discovered that there was probable cause to believe a criminal act was committed.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Bennett v. Brownlow, 1 CA-CV 03-0233, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, June 1, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: County ordinance that required public event sponsors to be nonprofit organizations was unconstitutional because the nonprofit limitation was not significantly related to nor narrowly tailored to achieve any valid government purpose or interest.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Bond Forfeiture, 2 CA-CV 2003-0165, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, June 7, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Absent any attempt to prevent deportation or arrange the alien's temporary return for a court appearance, the surety could not claim that a deportation order alone made its compliance with the bond conditions impossible.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Kuehn v. Stanley, 2 CA-CV 2003-0136, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT A, June 7, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Summary judgment for bank and appraiser on homebuyers' negligence, fraud, and breach of contract claims was proper, because buyers had not and were not justified in relying on appraisal that was done for financing purposes and not for their benefit.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.