 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Adrian E. v. Ariz. Dep't of Econ. Sec., 2 CA-JV 2006-0053,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, May 18, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Pursuant to Ariz. R.P. Juv. Ct. 64(C), a juvenile court had authority to terminate a father's parental rights when he did not appear for a status conference. While the form of notice to the father had some inadequacies, termination was proper because the father had actual notice of the conference and of the consequences of his failure to appear.
|
|||||
| Home Builders Ass'n v. City of Maricopa, 2 CA-CV 2006-0188,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT A, May 18, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A county had authority under Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 11-1101 to enter into no-fee development agreements, a city was the successor-in-interest to the county and to the binding agreements, Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 9-463.05(B)(3) was inapplicable, and honoring the fees was not discriminatory under Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 9-463.05(B)(5).
|
|||||
| Airfreight Express, LTD v. Evergreen Air Ctr., Inc., 2 CA-CV 2006-0149,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, May 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dismissal of an airfreight company's contract and fraud claims in a first action against a repair service without prejudice was not a merits adjudication and thus did not bar a second action that contained related claims; as claim preclusion did not bar these claims, dismissal of claims in the second action on that basis was error.
|
|||||
| Felder v. Physiotherapy Assocs., 1 CA-CV 05-0719,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE DEPARTMENT C, May 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although a professional baseball player could not conclusively prove the amount of earnings lost when his career was ended by an eye injury, it was proper for the trial court to submit the issue to a jury because the fact of damage was proven and the player had more than a vague hope of a successful baseball career.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
