Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - Arizona - April 22, 2003

  
Moedt v. GMC, Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-03-0030-PR, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, April 22, 2003, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Parker v. AZ Interscholastic, Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-02-0437-PR, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, April 22, 2003, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Porter v. Triad of Ariz., Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-02-0414-PR, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, April 22, 2003, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Qwest Corp. v. Kelly, Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-02-0404-PR, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, April 22, 2003, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Smith v. Cigna Healthplan, Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-02-0408-PR, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, April 22, 2003, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
State ex rel. Romley v. Martin, Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-02-0267-PR, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, April 22, 2003, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
State v. Booker, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-02-0364-PR, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, April 22, 2003, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
State v. Cecil, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-02-0033-PR, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, April 22, 2003, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
State v. Thues, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-02-0401-PR, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, April 22, 2003, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Underground Techs., Inc. v. Indus. Comm'n, 2 CA-IC 2002-0023, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT A, April 22, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: A finding in favor of the employee was proper where res judicata was not applicable because the employee's loss of earning capacity claim at the time of the first award was not the relevant claim that the ALJ was asked to assess currently.

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top