 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Davis, Supreme Court No. SB-99-0078-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, April 26, 2000, Decided , April 26, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Sill, Arizona Supreme Court No. SB-00-0026-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, April 26, 2000, Decided , April 26, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Respondent was not currently practicing law and did not think he would ever practice law again, thus a suspension exceeding six months, which would require proof of rehabilitation, was not necessary.
|
|||||
| Davis v. Arizona Dep't of Revenue, 1 CA-TX 99-0010,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT T, April 27, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Individual taxpayers were not allowed tax credits in their capacity as S corporation shareholders for their corporation's payment of C corporation schedule taxes paid to another state where it filed as a C corporation.
|
|||||
| A Tumbling-T Ranches v. Paloma Inv. Ltd. Pshp., 1 CA-CV 98-0605,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, May 2, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment for dam and stream bed owners and controllers was reversed; farmers sustaining flood damage met burden of proof that breach of dam increased their damages and were not required to show individualized damages.
|
|||||
| Baker ex rel. Hall Brake Supply, Inc. v. Stewart Title & Trust, Inc., 1 CA-CV 99-0211,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, May 2, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellee title agency faced possible vicarious liability because of the conduct of its escrow agent in fraudulently furthering its business, but not liability for conspiracy or racketeering it was not involved in.
|
|||||
| Hislop v. Salt River Project Agric. Improvement & Power Dist., 1 CA-CV 98-0232,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT B, May 2, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under Arizona law, appellants, as co-worker and friend of a negligently injured person, could not recover for the emotional distress suffered from witnessing the injury to that person.
|
|||||
| State v. Paleo, 1 CA-CR 99-0562,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT B, May 2, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Batson test required prosecutor to give race-neutral reason for not exercising peremptory challenge where failure to exercise resulted in procedural exclusion of sole remaining Hispanic venireperson.
|
|||||
| Johnson v. Pankratz, 1 CA-CV 99-0431,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, May 4, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A daughter suing her father for battery in incidents involving sexual abuse did not have to prove dollar amount of general damages in order to recover compensatory damages for distress and to seek punitive damages.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
