 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Martin v. Martin, 1 CA-CV 99-0417,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT D, July 13, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Divorce decree provided child support payments were to be adjusted based on CPI, so later arrearage judgment including previously omitted adjustments was proper; payments were correctly applied first to interest, then to principal.
|
|||||
| State v. Gomez, 1 CA-CR 99-0152,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT A, July 13, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Police had reasonable basis to believe 911 caller was sufficiently reliable in reporting that defendant was waving a gun from a truck, as the call was traceable since it was made from her home, thus investigatory stop was proper.
|
|||||
| Western Agric. Ins. Co. v. Chrysler Corp., 1 CA-CV 99-0451,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT D, July 13, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In suit brought by insurer against car maker and dealer, appeal of denial of motion to compel arbitration could be taken to superior court. Agreement to arbitrate was binding, although parties were not all signatories.
|
|||||
| In re Dawson, Arizona Supreme Court No. SB-00-0043-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, July 18, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Heath, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0466-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, July 18, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment vacated and remanded. It was unclear whether the trial judge determined prior convictions would constitute felonies in Arizona; if trial judge made that determination, sentence was properly enhanced, if not, resentencing needed.
|
|||||
| State v. Morales, 2 CA-CR 99-0048,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT A, July 18, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conviction for aggravated DUI affirmed where closing argument alleviated any ambiguity in jury instruction regarding impairment, and question to appellant on whether he thought officers were lying was not fundamental error.
|
|||||
| State v. Gold, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0383-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, July 19, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Rodriguez, 2 CA-CR 98-0599,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, July 20, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction of aggravated driving under the influence of alcohol not barred by double jeopardy or collateral estoppel; jury's inability to reach a verdict in earlier DUI trial did not carry collateral estoppel consequences.
|
|||||
| In re Gorman, Supreme Court No. SB-00-0061-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, July 21, 2000, Decided , July 21, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was censured and placed on probation for one year; he failed to adequately communicate with clients, was not diligent in handling client's matters, failed to serve defendant in one action, and failed to file a claim in another.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
