|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Arizona - April 9 - April 19, 2002
|
| |
|
| |
State v. Tousignant, 1 CA-CR 01-0418,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT B, April 9, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Defendant, who had violated his probation under a state statute that called for mandatory probation for drug offenders, wished to reject probation. Trial court erred, however, in accepting defendant's rejection. Probation was to be reinstated.
|
|
| |
Young v. Johnson, 1 CA-CV 00-0159,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, April 9, 2002, Decided , April 9, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
In re Oakley, Supreme Court No. SB-02-0075-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, April 19, 2002, Decided , April 19, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Attorney was censured where, inter alia, he failed to abide by clients' decisions regarding objectives of representation, failed to consult with them as to means by which objectives were to be pursued, and failed to act with reasonable diligence.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|