 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re King, Arizona Supreme Court No. SB-03-0152-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, June 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney who pleaded guilty to attempted murder was denied admission to the Arizona bar because he failed to make an extraordinary showing that he accepted responsibility for the shooting, as his written applications for admission to law school and the Arizona bar minimized his personal responsibility for the shooting.
|
|||||
| Andresano v. County of Pima, 2 CA-CV 2005-0151,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT A, June 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An injured party brought suit against county when she broke her ankle during a charity event on county's facilities. Trial court properly granted summary judgment for county because Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 33-1551 applied; injured party did not personally pay fee, and charity's user fee was not an admission fee or other consideration.
|
|||||
| State v. Celaya, 2 CA-CR 2005-0248,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT A, June 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant sought post-conviction relief; however, appellate court dismissed appeal because it lacked subject matter jurisdiction under Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-4033(B).
|
|||||
| Fry v. Garcia, 1 CA-CV 05-0663,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT D, July 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In review of grandparents' visitation rights, superior court properly denied mother's motion for relief pursuant to Ariz. R. Civ. P. 60(c) because superior court was not divested of jurisdiction after parents' subsequent marriage, and mother's claim that attorney made misrepresentation was untimely filed.
|
|||||
| Schwager v. VHS Acquisition Corp., 1 CA-CV 05-0677,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT B, July 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In nurse's suit against hospital, and hospital's employee arising out of slip and fall that occurred as nurse was leaving work, hospital and its employee were immune from suit pursuant to Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 23-1022(A). Appellate court rejected nurse's argument that she was lent employee.
|
|||||
| State v. Parks, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-05-0373-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, July 10, 2006, Decided , July 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Fearnow v. Ridenour, Swenson, Cleere & Evans, P.C., Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-05-0217-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, July 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Shareholder agreement did not violate Ariz. Sup. Ct. R. 42, ER 5.6(a), because it did not restrict the attorney's right to practice law after he voluntarily left law firm; the agreement was to be evaluated under the well-established law governing similar restrictive covenants in agreements between non-lawyers.
|
|||||
| Bolser Enters. v. Ariz. Registrar of Contrs., No. 1 CA-CV 05-0355,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, July 25, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Superior court erred by dismissing the builder's complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, because the Arizona Registrar of Contractors' disciplinary notice revoking the builder's license constituted a final administrative decision subject to judicial review by the superior court.
|
|||||
| Bohart v. Hanna, Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-06-0225-AP/EL,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, July 26, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Elector sought to remove candidate from city council's ballot. Elector's notice of appeal from superior court's decision was untimely, pursuant to Ariz. R. Civ. P. 6(a), because his notice of appeal was not filed until six days after superior court's decision, and weekends and holiday were not excluded from time calculation.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
