 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Griffith, Supreme Court No. SB-00-0038-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, May 5, 2000, Decided , May 5, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was censured and ordered to pay restitution for failing to discuss the case and appeal issues with his client and for failing to advise his client of available options following his client's affirmed conviction.
|
|||||
| State v. Talmadge, Supreme Court No. CR-98-0312-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, May 5, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In criminal child abuse case, trial court's ruling preventing Scottish expert on temporary brittle bone disease from testifying as defense expert witness was an abuse of discretion, and the error was reversible.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Pownall, 1 CA-CV 99-0074,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT C, May 9, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In divorce case, premarital agreement was valid, wife was not entitled to interest in businesses started by husband, reimbursement to wife for community income was proper, and award of attorneys' fees to wife was proper.
|
|||||
| State v. Adams, 1 CA-CR 98-0528,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, May 9, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Criminal defendant whose business premises was subjected to lawful search had reasonable expectation of privacy in personal residence unlawfully maintained on same property, thus evidence seized from residence was properly suppressed.
|
|||||
| Panzino v. City of Phoenix, Supreme Court No. CV-99-0193-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, May 10, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where plaintiff's counsel failed to timely pursue plaintiff's personal injury actions and the actions were dismissed, court declined to adopt the positive misconduct rule as a basis for relief.
|
|||||
| State v. Martinez, Supreme Court No. CR-98-0393-AP,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, May 11, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's first-degree murder conviction and death sentence were affirmed upon automatic appeal as the trial court did not error in dismissing jurors, the evidence was properly admitted, and the jury was properly instructed.
|
|||||
| Kaibab Indus. v. Industrial Comm'n, 1 CA-IC 99-0068,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT C, May 16, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where employee sought to reopen two Arizona industrial injury claims after sustaining a third injury in Utah, successive-injury doctrine did not apply because no new injury occurred in Utah and Utah employer was not present in proceedings.
|
|||||
| State v. Cotton, 1 CA-CR 99-0180,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT A, May 16, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Convictions for deaths of pregnant girlfriend and her child were affirmed. The infant was a "person" at the time of her death, a day after the shooting, it was irrelevant that the injuries killing her were inflicted in utero.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
